This first post of Jury Rights begins with reference to a Document:
The United States Constitution and those parts pertaining to Jury Trials.
Credit: Cornell Law School
http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.overview.html
The words contained are not just ink on paper but the Memorial and Standard built with parchment and not stones.
When people gaze at the ink markings made on parchment the meanings of those marks are eternal as the Soul of Man that they were meant to Guide.The meanings do not change,only those men that gaze upon them change,either from Light to darkness,or from darkness to Light.
Article III
Section 2
3rd Paragraph
The trial of all crimes, except in cases of impeachment, shall be by jury; and such trial shall be held in the state where the said crimes shall have been committed; but when not committed within any state, the trial shall be at such place or places as the Congress may by law have directed.
Article IV
Section 4. The United States shall guarantee to every state in this union a republican form of government, and shall protect each of them against invasion; and on application of the legislature, or of the executive (when the legislature cannot be convened) against domestic violence.
Amendment V
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
Amendment VI
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.
Amendment VII
In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.
Amendment VIII
Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.
Amendment IX
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
Amendment X
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.
Tuesday, June 19, 2007
Monday, June 18, 2007
Side stepping the Jury
You are crazy,therefore you have no standing in court
It is the Law.
How would you feel if you heard those words standing in a court room as a defendant?
In most states in the USA there are provisions for having some one declared mentally incompetent by having "Court Approved" psychologists and psychiatrists interview a person and then pass judgment as to whether that individual will be allowed to proceed in the court system based on his own desires,counsel and decisions.
If a court appointed "guardian" is appointed after a finding of being "mentally incompetent",you no longer are a free man before the law.You are a Subject,not a citizen,a slave not a free man.
You can be forcibly restrained ,drugged,beaten if you resist,yes and even murdered,all of the preceding being done "legally".
This is not about the Soviet Union,Communist China or Cuba,all of which do the above to their subjects,but right here in the U.S.A..
There has been a conspiratorial movement underway among a certain cabal in the legal system right here in the United States to overcome citizens who are and will exercise their God given Right to hold the judiciary to the Principles of the U.S and States Constitutions.
This is put into affect by requiring "certain" persons to have psychiatric evualations before they will be "allowed" to use the court system.This includes but is not limited to:
Can you see where this is going.
Scenario:
You come before a judge at a hearing in a matter in which you are acting as your own counsel.
The judge takes an immediate dislike and disrespect to you.When ever you speak they interupt you and when you resist their tryanny they imply you must be crazy.
From that point on you have no standing in the court.If the "judge" lets you walk out of the court without having you committed to a psychiatric hospital ,you are informed that you can not procede in their court with out being "approved" by a psychiatrist.
Every psychologist and psychiatrist that you must go to see and be "approved" by is from a list of "court approved" psychologists and psychiatrists.Meaning that no psychologist and psychiatrist is allowed on that list unless thy have previously been approved by the judges of that court system.
Generally the psychologists or psychiatrists are friends or familiars of the judges.Even if they are not they are not superior to the "judges" that will be channeling them subjects to extract fees from to prove that they are not "crazy".
If the thoughts in your mind right now are that this is a preposterous ranting and raving of a disaffected person,you are the reason why this tyrannical imbalance in our country now exists.
You the reader, I pray, will see for the sake of Dear Liberty,that what is wrong with the present form of judicial systems in this country today is that the checks and balances have been removed.
What if the judges, psychologists and psychiatrists were all Christian hating socialists,and you were a Constitutionalist challenging your arrest at a Anti WTO Rally for failure to "obey" a police officer who beat you because you were wearing a cross?
You see I pray,language of the court still to this day,that you can see, to rely only on the Goodness,Honesty and decency of Man,for the judges to be fair in the above case is to be a fool or evil,or both.What delusion do you labor under,what hatered rages in your heart towards your fellow citizen that you would allow such possibilities of cruel oppression to exist in the land of Liberty?
Trial by Jury.
Trial by We the People ,not trial by judges.
Trial by Jury,not trial by judge with a jury.
Trial by your fellow citizens using their standards to judge your actions,not the Commands,Dictates and Instructions of ONE person,who may represent a political faction working to destroy the foundations of the Liberty you Love and which founded this dominion of the USA for it's people.
Trial of your thoughts and heart only in the sanctity of the hearts and minds of your fellow citizens as jurors,answerable to NO ONE else on earth,especially not to one person.
It is the Law.
How would you feel if you heard those words standing in a court room as a defendant?
In most states in the USA there are provisions for having some one declared mentally incompetent by having "Court Approved" psychologists and psychiatrists interview a person and then pass judgment as to whether that individual will be allowed to proceed in the court system based on his own desires,counsel and decisions.
If a court appointed "guardian" is appointed after a finding of being "mentally incompetent",you no longer are a free man before the law.You are a Subject,not a citizen,a slave not a free man.
You can be forcibly restrained ,drugged,beaten if you resist,yes and even murdered,all of the preceding being done "legally".
This is not about the Soviet Union,Communist China or Cuba,all of which do the above to their subjects,but right here in the U.S.A..
There has been a conspiratorial movement underway among a certain cabal in the legal system right here in the United States to overcome citizens who are and will exercise their God given Right to hold the judiciary to the Principles of the U.S and States Constitutions.
This is put into affect by requiring "certain" persons to have psychiatric evualations before they will be "allowed" to use the court system.This includes but is not limited to:
- persons who file cases as Pro Se,or in other words without paying a Bar Association Union Lawyer his fee.
- persons rejecting laws that they consider unjust or not applying to the matter at hand,all of this being determined by only one person,a so called"judge".(Recall that persons are arrested and brought to trial by a judge with no right to trial by Jury. There is no mechanism in place in the entire United States to stop that interference in their life,except by the "mercy" of a person who is benefiting or who personally wants the arrest of that citizen)
Can you see where this is going.
Scenario:
You come before a judge at a hearing in a matter in which you are acting as your own counsel.
The judge takes an immediate dislike and disrespect to you.When ever you speak they interupt you and when you resist their tryanny they imply you must be crazy.
From that point on you have no standing in the court.If the "judge" lets you walk out of the court without having you committed to a psychiatric hospital ,you are informed that you can not procede in their court with out being "approved" by a psychiatrist.
Every psychologist and psychiatrist that you must go to see and be "approved" by is from a list of "court approved" psychologists and psychiatrists.Meaning that no psychologist and psychiatrist is allowed on that list unless thy have previously been approved by the judges of that court system.
Generally the psychologists or psychiatrists are friends or familiars of the judges.Even if they are not they are not superior to the "judges" that will be channeling them subjects to extract fees from to prove that they are not "crazy".
If the thoughts in your mind right now are that this is a preposterous ranting and raving of a disaffected person,you are the reason why this tyrannical imbalance in our country now exists.
You the reader, I pray, will see for the sake of Dear Liberty,that what is wrong with the present form of judicial systems in this country today is that the checks and balances have been removed.
What if the judges, psychologists and psychiatrists were all Christian hating socialists,and you were a Constitutionalist challenging your arrest at a Anti WTO Rally for failure to "obey" a police officer who beat you because you were wearing a cross?
You see I pray,language of the court still to this day,that you can see, to rely only on the Goodness,Honesty and decency of Man,for the judges to be fair in the above case is to be a fool or evil,or both.What delusion do you labor under,what hatered rages in your heart towards your fellow citizen that you would allow such possibilities of cruel oppression to exist in the land of Liberty?
Trial by Jury.
Trial by We the People ,not trial by judges.
Trial by Jury,not trial by judge with a jury.
Trial by your fellow citizens using their standards to judge your actions,not the Commands,Dictates and Instructions of ONE person,who may represent a political faction working to destroy the foundations of the Liberty you Love and which founded this dominion of the USA for it's people.
Trial of your thoughts and heart only in the sanctity of the hearts and minds of your fellow citizens as jurors,answerable to NO ONE else on earth,especially not to one person.
How to solve this side stepping?Any one accused of mental incompetency by our public servants would be brought before a Grand Jury and they alone would decide competency.If some one was claiming to be Jesus himself and explained to the citizens of the Grand Jury that is why the laws of our land do not apply to him,does anyone in integrity think the majority of USA citizens on a Grand Jury would accept that?
But if a person claims that because he is a disciple of Jesus Christ the Redeemer and he will not cooperate with the existing judicial system on a certain matter,but otherwise agrees and in fact does obey all other laws, does any one of integrity think he should be stripped of his God given rights? In the Land of Liberty, if another Grand Jury has determined a person is to stand for a trial by a Jury for an action which brought him before the judiciary to begin with,only the citizens can make the judgement of competency.To do other wise is to allow evil to rule the Land.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
